Microbial indicators of peatland degradation and restoration at Holme Moss
How do restoration projects affect soil microbial communities? What are the functional implications for the soil? How can we use microbial community data to improve land management?
Indicator species analysis
- Which microbes “drive” the community ordination?
- Which microbes can indicate biotic and abiotic factors of interest?
- Methods of De Caceres and Legendre (2009) implemented in indicspecies package for R
Practicalities of using microbial indicators
- Community sequencing affordable, getting cheaper. Using the community as an indicator of multiple factors is a real possibility
- Pre-identified indicators can be detected by cheaper means. e.g. real-time PCR, microarray
- Microbial indicators not established but easy to find candidates
Possible Applications of microbial indicators
- Biomonitor
- Pollution e.g. heavy metals, N
- Pathogen
- Invasive / non-native species
- Assess ecological process potential
- Methanotrophy
- Nitrogen fixation
- Carbon fixation
- Bioremediation
- Degradation risk warning
- Restoration success indicator
- Identify suitable sites for plant/sphagnum introduction
- Monitoring areas with little macroscopic life / diversity
Conclusions
- Land management practice clearly evidenced in soil microbiome
- Functional implications poorly understood but can be deduced by range of methods
- Great potential for using microbes as ecological indicators
Related posts:
Aspects of microbial communities in peatland carbon cycling under changing climate and land use pres...
Networks of Power and Influence
Analyses of taxon-clusters in replicated networks to assess alternative microbiomes in corals
Microbial communities and biogeochemical functioning across peatlands in the Athabasca Oil Sands reg...