Microbial indicators of peatland degradation and restoration at Holme Moss
How do restoration projects affect soil microbial communities? What are the functional implications for the soil? How can we use microbial community data to improve land management?
Indicator species analysis
- Which microbes “drive” the community ordination?
- Which microbes can indicate biotic and abiotic factors of interest?
- Methods of De Caceres and Legendre (2009) implemented in indicspecies package for R
Practicalities of using microbial indicators
- Community sequencing affordable, getting cheaper. Using the community as an indicator of multiple factors is a real possibility
- Pre-identified indicators can be detected by cheaper means. e.g. real-time PCR, microarray
- Microbial indicators not established but easy to find candidates
Possible Applications of microbial indicators
- Biomonitor
- Pollution e.g. heavy metals, N
- Pathogen
- Invasive / non-native species
- Assess ecological process potential
- Methanotrophy
- Nitrogen fixation
- Carbon fixation
- Bioremediation
- Degradation risk warning
- Restoration success indicator
- Identify suitable sites for plant/sphagnum introduction
- Monitoring areas with little macroscopic life / diversity
Conclusions
- Land management practice clearly evidenced in soil microbiome
- Functional implications poorly understood but can be deduced by range of methods
- Great potential for using microbes as ecological indicators
Related posts:
Temperature response of methane oxidation and production potentials in peatland ecosystems across Fi...
Surface Stability in Drylands is Influenced by Dispersal Strategy of Soil Bacteria
Soil microbes of the Kalahari and the Pennines
Microbial community responses in degraded peatlands undergoing restoration in the Southern Pennines